Iko Roofing Class Action Lawsuit

Funny how for years and years i advised my customers iko shingles were an inferior alternative when compared to several other top shelf alternatives and now i notice so many people are now involved with the iko class action lawsuit filed by numerous states.

Iko roofing class action lawsuit.

This class action lawsuit claims that iko cambridge ar roof shingles are defective and prone to premature blistering tearing cracking delamination granule loss degradation and loss of adhesion at the seal strip between adjacent shingles. The plaintiffs claimed that the shingles were defective and tended to crack curl blister fishmouth claw discolor break or otherwise not perform according to reasonable expectations. A settlement has been reached in the litigation. The class action affects current or former owners or lessees of buildings located in canada that contain or contained iko organic shingles.

Iko defective roof shingles class action lawsuit. This settlement resolves a long hard fought combined class action against a number of iko companies who manufactured or sold certain organic asphalt roofing shingles primarily between 1978 and 2008. As part of the settlement iko paid 7 5 million for the benefit of class members. The representative plaintiff on behalf of himself and the class claimed damages from the defendants iko industries ltd canroof corporation inc and i g.

The company is the target of class action lawsuits in the us and canada. The defendants have agreed to. Iko and the plaintiff on behalf of the class have agreed to settle the canadian class action relating to alleged defects in iko organic shingles. According to the suits defects in design and manufacture allow moisture such as water or snow to invade the shingles.

Average iko consumer ratings are poor dragged down by widespread failure of organic shingles and the cambridge ar line. Iko class action lawsuit. Under the terms of the iko roofing class action settlement homeowners who purchased the allegedly faulty shingles from iko would receive a five year extension on their warranty of the products. Machine fibers ltd for the alleged negligent design and manufacture of iko organic shingles.

In this litigation in re. However the defective shingle lines are no longer produced and iko has been working hard on improving formulations across the board. District court for the central district of illinois the named plaintiffs representatives of owners of buildings on which iko organic asphalt roofing shingles the shingles were installed alleged that the shingles were defective or failed to perform as promised. This can cause the shingles to crack blister curl or blow off the roof and can also damage interior walls ceilings and other household structures.

Iko roofing shingle products liability litigation mdl docket no. Class action lawsuits have been filed against iko manufacturing alleging that the company s organic roofing shingles are defective and fail well before their useful life expectancies. 2104 filed in the u s. The settlement does not affect persons with iko fiberglass shingles some of which have been sold under the same brand names as iko organic shingles.

They would also be entitled to a cash payment or replacement shingles if their previously purchased shingles fail within the extended warranty. What is this class action about.